Risk Assessments and Expert consultations for Criminal Responsibility Cases in Los Angeles CA

Forensic Clarity Rooted in Clinical Precision

I’m Dr. Sarah DeMarco, a licensed psychologist specializing in forensic evaluations at Sarah DeMarco, Psy.D. Clinical & Forensic Psychology. My work is designed to inform legal decision-making through objective, clinically grounded opinions. I do not represent or advocate for either party in a case, instead, I act as a neutral evaluator providing insight into a defendant’s mental state at the time of the alleged crime.

Criminal responsibility evaluations require a nuanced understanding of mental illness, behavior, and legal standards such as "not guilty by reason of insanity" or diminished capacity. These are complex determinations that require a deep, evidence-based analysis of how mental health may have influenced behavior.

Who I Work With & What They Face

I’m typically retained by defense attorneys, prosecutors, or appointed directly by the court. In these cases, the individuals I evaluate often have a documented history of severe mental illness, conditions that may impair judgment, perception, or impulse control. The stakes are high, and outcomes can affect not only the individual’s liberty but also public safety and the integrity of the legal process.

Risk assessments are a central component of these evaluations. I examine whether a defendant poses a current or future threat to themselves or others and explore patterns that may suggest a propensity for violence, suicidality, or reoffending. My expert consultations help legal professionals understand whether a mental disorder may have significantly impaired a person’s ability to form intent or distinguish right from wrong at the time of the offense.

This is where my role in conducting risk assessments and expert consultations for criminal responsibility cases in Los Angeles CA, becomes critical. I translate complex psychological information into language the court can use to make informed legal decisions.

A Transparent, Structured Evaluation Process

Every criminal responsibility case begins with a clear, ethical boundary: I only take on cases where I can maintain objectivity. If I’ve previously treated the person, have a conflict of interest, or believe I cannot provide an impartial opinion, I decline the referral.

If the case is appropriate, I begin with a thorough review of medical records, legal documents, and collateral information. I conduct clinical interviews, psychological testing, and gather contextual details about the offense. My goal is to determine whether a mental disorder was present and, if so, whether it impaired the individual’s legal responsibility at the time of the incident.

When risk is involved, such as in cases of violent offenses, I conduct a structured risk assessment to evaluate current danger levels and potential future concerns. This helps the court consider not only past mental state but future implications for treatment, incarceration, or supervision.

Why My Evaluations Stand Out

At Sarah DeMarco, Psy.D. Clinical & Forensic Psychology, I provide evaluations that are comprehensive, impartial, and aligned with both clinical standards and legal requirements. I understand how important these cases are, not just for the individuals involved, but for the justice system as a whole. My reports are built on psychological data, legal relevance, and an unwavering commitment to neutrality.

What sets my work apart is my ability to communicate clearly. Judges, attorneys, and juries need findings they can understand and apply to the questions at hand. My consultations offer clarity, not confusion, when it matters most.

Begin With a Consultation

If you're in need of risk assessments and expert consultations for criminal responsibility cases in Los Angeles CA, I welcome you to reach out. Whether you’re a defense attorney, prosecutor, or court representative, I bring clinical expertise and forensic integrity to each evaluation. Let’s start with a consultation to determine how I can support your legal process with clarity, objectivity, and professionalism.